phil said:
If by as unbiased as possible you mean "counting dogshit that has 60% or less average ratings just as much as those that have 90% or above to help the 360 have a larger number of exclusives," then you have indeed done your job. However, if you want to do an ACTUAL unbiased survey of the market where games that are actually good are the only ones that count, then your precious 360 seems to do more poorly than your bullshit biased survey would indicate. |
Really? Seems to me like the 360 has more of the "actually good ones that count" too. 
Who determines what is good, by the way? Everyone has different opinions and places like Metacritic/Gamerankings are the only logical place to go unless you want to poll every single gamer who has played that particular game to get the total aggregate score (which would be impossible).
His survey shows that while the 360 has more lower rated games, it also has more highly rated games than the PS3. Just because it doesn't agree with what you want, doesn't mean it is biased. 
If he wanted, he could have included the arcade games and that would have made things even more in the 360's favor.







