Rpruett said:
You are using percentages. I am stating the fact that by shere NUMBERS the 360 has more games, and more higher rated games. Not a higher "percentage" of well rated games. The percentage doesn't matter if it still has more well rated games that people can buy. Look at the wii, it has plenty of crap rated games and it still gets tons of software sales and has some well rated ones people buy.
I'm well aware of this. When looking towards the future (Which is what most console buyers will do), the PS3 is going to provide more quality games going by the numbers than the Xbox 360.
Again, you are not a representation of the "majority" of console buyers. They will not research future titles, and will merely walk into the store, see the greater 360 selection and lower price, and get that.
But most people already own a PC from a few years ago, and to get a PC that will play on the same level as the 360 would cost an additional $100-150.
Check out the numbers from Dell or other places. Most PC's are under2 years old. Certainly some Grandparent has a dinosaur from 1998, but we're not even talking about that category of person.
Really? People enjoy games with extremely jaggy visuals, flat surfaces with no details, etc. etc.? That may be true for some, but not a majority.
You're absolutely right....It's practically unplayable and totally unenjoyable.

|