Rpruett said:
While certainly you could make cases for people/companies/etc not getting what they 'deserve' in terms of money. In the business it's all about catering to your consumers. Being that how good of a product is 'highly' subjective in nature, they apparently did not put out a good enough product to generate enough revenue. Troika really did nothing of note (Other than mediocrity) to my knowledge (Correct me if I am wrong). Clover was a solid studio and their games were generally solid overall, But we have no idea what budget Capcom dished out to them to create games. Also, Clover created good games but many/most of which were more niche based titles that didn't relate well to the largest selling markets. While that doesn't deem them "bad", it certainly doesn't indite their talent necessarily either. |
Your view excludes those companies which produce good products such as the above while encompassing shovelware makers who glean large profits off small investments with shoddy products.
Profit as a metric of quality does not work and attacking the quality of good former developers using that metric is an insult to their accomplishments.







