| Sqrl said: Ok seriously the "Hus defense" is getting old. If Hus would learn to approach these things without being abrasive then he wouldn't get this type of reaction back at him. Lets take a look at Hus' post: "Article is a joke, lets see the full interview not what they picked apart to make that crap. Now lets see that in "I want to be taken seriously" mode:
Those two posts are identical in meaningful information but completely different in how people will react to them. Hus for some reason hasn't figured this out, and it boggles my mind that people defend Hus when time after time he proves himself incapable of phrasing things in a manner that fosters intelligent discussion and instead finds it neccessary to post in a way that creates controversy. He can't continually do this over and over and over again and go "What'd I do?". |
Not to mention that the article ddn't actually take anything out of context, which is what he was asserting.
