By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Skeeuk said:

well i have to admit you are a trolling/flaming mod.

i wouldnt have replied but you mentioned "oblivion content" and "fallout content" to bump up the list numbers. both of them games 1 without the extra content are availiable on ps3 anyways. the extra content shouldnt make it in the list, otherwise why dont you add eternal sonata in ps3 list because it has exclusive content.

ive took your list with obliv and fallout out of it, and also took out last remnant. as its only fair. LR will be multiplat. ive also added another rpg on 360, zoids assault.

X360:

Blue Dragon

Tales of Vesperia

Two Worlds

Mass Effect series

Zoids assault

Kingdom Under Fire (possibly the entire series)

Fable 2

Culdcept Saga

Infinite Undiscovery

+ Star Ocean, Venetica, Dungeon Hero, and a few others for upcoming exclusive RPGs.

 

Playstation 3:

Folklore

Disagaea 3

Valkyria Chroncles

White Knight Chronicles

Demon Souls

Cross Edge

+ Final Fantasy vsXIII

360 does indeed offer more for the rpg gamer, i dont doubt that at all. but your just trying to take a digg at ps3 when theres nothing to moan about in the 1st place. 360 has more rpg`s thats the more correct statement. for a rpg gamer the 360 would be the better choice at this time.

but a mod having a rant like that is not on.

And now your begining to play the 'lets take out a system's advantages to make the other one look better' game. I forgot quite a few X360 exclusive RPGs, so I could add those as well vs. the 2 you just added to my list.

Secondly, I don't get how a game having an extra 10-20 hours of gameplay can't be considered a benefit over the other system's version. Take it out if you feel like it, but I have my reasons for adding it. If one version provides a definite advantage in terms of content, then it's a good thing - especially given the fact they both released the same date.

As for The Last Remnant, we STILL have no data on when it's coming to the PS3. And the fact is, I've put 30 hours into TLR on my 360. You, as a PS3 owner have put 0 hours into the game. Cut it how you like, but I'm still playing TLR and a PS3 owner is not. That, in my book, is an advantage. I could of used the same rhetoric for vsXIII, but I chose not to.

I don't get how my opinion is a trolling/flamebaiting argument. The X360 has 12+ RPGs that are playable only on the 360, and not the PS3 at this very second, and the PS3 only has 3 (in the west mind you. WKC will be #4) that are unplayable on the 360. That's not opinion, that's fact.

As a RPG fan, how can you argue 12+ titles against 3-4? It wouldn't make sense that I can play thousands of hours of RPG gaming goodness vs. a few hundred.

 



Back from the dead, I'm afraid.