|
I commend this thread, but it lost all credibility as soon as I saw the word metacritic. You also fail to address the effects of a years head start in any way. If Metacritic isn't credible, what is? There's only so many ways you can make an argument for a system having 'good' games, and Metacritic/GameRankings is one of the few ways it works. I could make the same argument against some of the PS3 games that could head to the 360. Of course, I'd be labeled a fanboy if I said 'MGS4 360', but your doing the same thing with Halo 3, aren't you? It's been out for 16 months and no PC port. Something tells me your grasping at straws. So it's Microsoft's fault that publishers never ported their games to the PS3? Amazing. Maybe we should blame the the global recession on weather conditions on Fiji. Did you notice he broke the scores down by 10% points each? It's not like he lumped everything together. How does he lose credibility if he did his best to provide a balanced look, but not a pro-Sony argument? All you need to do is look at the list to see there are 3 games the 360 has over the PS3 that are above 80%. I'm sorry he didn't bend over backwards to appease Sony fans. |
Back from the dead, I'm afraid.







