I can point at a few quotes:
through science, which is puerly observation, its fair to say that the concious mind is either active with in the body, or the body is dead. The concios mind does not exist in some sort of physical form and there for cant be transfered.
(This one does not follow... a mind is interdependent with a body, therefore the mind is not physical??)
How can I possibly claim that conciousnes is not contained within the physical? Because as we know anything that is mechanic must follow its proticol.
(Again, does not follow. You are saying that something physical has a protocol, therefore consciousness is not physical. Apparently you assume consciousness does not have a protocol, yet you give no reasons for that assumption. Our belief that we have freedom of choice does not automatically imply we don't follow a protocol)
Yes, but the assumptions are supposed to be stated explicitly, and they are not supposed to be the conclusions of the theory. In your post you state repeatedly that "there is more to life than the physical", yet there's no clear support of that from any assumptions you state.
But where have you proven that a conscious mind isn't purely biomechanical / bioelectrical / biochemical or similar?
What definition of mechanical are you using here? An analog computer can just as well be based on chemistry or electricity as mechanics, it encompasses a lot of different things actually. There are even DNA-based computers.
I mentioned analog computers to disprove your statement that "a computer only uses 0s and 1s". You attempted to diminish the notion of a computer by saying it can only use 0s and 1s, which is only true for a subset of all computers.
My Mario Kart Wii friend code: 2707-1866-0957







