Rath said:
Nirvana_Nut85 said:
Rath said:
Firstly you misunderstand what I scientific theory in fact is, it is a hypothesis backed up by experiment. It is considered tested by science.
Secondly those passages you quoted are pseudo-scientific twaddle that make no sense whatsoever. Anybody with even the slightest hint of knowledge of the stuff they're talking about can see that. For one thing they know few to none of the properties of the Higgs Boson apart from the fact that it is an elementary particle - a human genome is an organism and made of billions of atoms. They are so completely different that to claim one is a reproduction of the other is just absolute twaddle. The other passage is just as bad.
To me it seems like they just threw in as many scientific terms into one paragraph and hoped that nobody would know what they were talking about other than the fact that it sound really really smart.
|
I am well aware of what a scientifc theory is, I have not misunderstood what that is, now I may be no scientist (I do have an understanding of it on an average level) I just believe that as far out as it may sound we were created through intelligent design, not by chance of evolution.
According to this Dr.Ujavorsky, his theories can be tested, and in all honesty I find that he does bring up some compelling arguments. I will also proivide a link if you would care to read it where you can look over some of his articles because he does bring up some interesting matters regardless of wether you want to call it pseudo science or what not. http://www.frontlinescience.com/3.html.
|
If you know what a scientific theory is why did you post 'It is a theory not a fact'?
Also you find Dr.Ujvarosy's arguments compelling because you agree with him, I do not find them compelling because they are twaddle. Most of the time he clearly has no idea what he is talking about, he doesn't even understand basic things like causality.
Can anybody find some information on Ujvarosy? I want to see where he got his doctorate from.
|
I'm having trouble even finding anywhere where he's called a Dr....
I'm also wonder if he's the same guy that argues aliens were around in biblical times.
I see him listed as an "Academia Consultant"
Which to me sounds like "Not qualified to teach."
But that's me.
I mean. He's a scientist... but he's the head scientist of a think tank he founded himself.
I mean... couldn't i technically do that right now?
