By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
NinjaKido said:
Onyxmeth said:
NinjaKido said:

 

When you say quality are you talking about "quality" are you reffering to high end graphics , quality writting , impressive soundtrack or simply how fun the game is to play ?

The prior can be compared more scientifcaly than the latter , if your basicaly trying to compare how fun 360 exclusives are in comparison to how enjoyable PS3 exclusives are then you've taken on a challenge I believe you won't succesfully be able to complete.

I'm just talking about seperating it the way you and Fumanchu suggested. If it can't be done correctly, which it looks like it can't, then I'd rather stick with the cold hard facts and leave the assumptions out. Assumptions are why this thread had to be made in the first place. No need to create new ones here.

 

 

What your using isn't exactly factual and i'll explain why . Your using factual metacritic data which gives a collection of subjective reviews of a particular game ,  your use of the data is factual however the data itself isn't so factual.

It's like saying 90% of the people on my street said Halo 3 pwns the crap out Street Fighter 2 , whilst my data might be factual and indisputable the subjective nature of the data is highly open to criticism.

All I meant by what I said is exactly what you clarified. I don't really believe in Metacritic much. It's merely a metric I used to seperate quality generically because it's a very popular metric to use and many people here trust it enough to be acceptable. Otherwise I would have just made two long lists and said "Here you go" and every naysayer would have said, "but the PS3 games are rated higher! The 360 stuff is all shovelware!" and at that point I would have had to use Metacritic to shut everyone up. Basically it was to cut them off at the pass.

 



Tag: Became a freaking mod and a complete douche, coincidentally, at the same time.