NinjaKido said:
Onyxmeth said:
Fumanchu said:
ChichiriMuyo said:
Onyxmeth said:
Jo21 said:
last renmant is multiplatform. |
If I give you $60 can you go to Target and buy me the PS3 or PC version? If not then it's exclusive. Exclusive means available on one platform right? That's what I heard. When Last Remnant no longer is exclusive, it will leave the list.
@Barozi
Can you get me a link on that? I heard SIREN had a retail disc for PAL territories. I'll switch it to the PSN list if it's not true. Destroy All Humans will be removed when another version comes out. Hour of Victory is coming off.
|
Perhaps you could mark temporary exclusives as such, then, since you're trying to create the illusion of being unbiased.
|
There is no 'illusion' here - he already stated that as these games become available on other systems they will be removed.
This is presenting the facts for 'right now'.
Onyx another popular belief is that the PS3 has a 'better variety of exclusives' - could you arrange the lists by genre?
|
I don't think I can. I didn't want to make any assumptions when doing this, just criteria I obtain from other places. If I seperate into genres, I would only do it based on another site's criteria like IGN, not my own since it would be assuming where some should be placed.
@Ninja-What would be quality? Where would I stop on the Metacritic?
|
Quality is entirely in the eye of the beholder but if we want to lean towards objectivity we might say that some things are clearly more quality than others Jay Z vs Soulja Boy for example , but in truth there is no such thing as subjective.
I'd probably rely on metacritic purley because there isn't a better way of comparing quality , that's not to say that metacritic is a good method in the first place.
|
Yeah but where do I stop? 70? 60? 50? Quality on the Metacritic scale is 75 but there are a lot of gaming favorites below that. It looks to me that there isn't anything anybody has vouched for below 60. If I do this is that a good place to end?
