HappySqurriel on 26 January 2009
| CGI-Quality said: @ vic You're comparing Killzone 1 (PS2), to a game in an entire different generation, on far more capable hardware, has a MUCH bigger budget, and now has a team that is more experienced and has released a better product (Killzone: Liberation - PSP) since the original was just average/"mediocre". Also, beta testers/early reviewers have all debunked your claim that it mirrors the original. Even though the OP was a bit jumbled, his message was clear, don't judge something you've yet to play. I cannot, myself, say if it's stellar or not since I have not played it. However, the word of mouth so far is filled with positives and that is helping my already hyped nature. Best to play the game first before you claim what it's going to or not going to be like! |
Wasn't Haze a game in an entire different generation, released on far more capable hardware, with a bigger budget and a more experienced development team than produced TimeSplitters?
Wasn't Lair a game in an entire different generation, released on far more capable hardware, with a bigger budget and a more experienced development team than produced Starwars Rogue Squadren 2?
I'm not saying Killzone 2 is in any way a similar result to those games, but the factors you listed for ensuring that Killzone 2 would be a better game have certainly not helped many games so far this generation.
