| Nirvana_Nut85 said:
Lets remember now that Evolution is not a scientific fact, it is a theory he did. Your biggest problem is that you sound just like every other person who claims they can debunk I.D, from the evolutionist side. When your give answer a statement made by someone you you use swear and use BOLDED letters and expect people to listen as if you were giving an educated response instead of an adolescent rant(or a fanboy rant for that matter). Honestly if your taking you I.D information off of youtube then there is your first fail. You should check out http://www.frontlinescience.com/. Dr. Kazmer Ujavorsy, has come up with some really interesting theories and below I'll give you some exerts from an article from the American Chronicle as well as a link to that. "Dark energy, that drives the expansion of the universe, is one of the deepest and most exciting puzzles in modern science. We posit that dark energy is the field manifestation of the parent seed of the universe, just as the cosmic vacuum’s zero-point energy. They all originate from the cosmic seed’s biophoton emissions, which blackbody radiation provides a holographic biofield for the generation of the physical universe. Based on the fact that the biophotonic radiation emitted by DNA is coherent, we predict that the cosmic seed's biophotonic field or "dark energy" is equally coherent." "The elusive Higgs boson – so vital to the Standard Model of particle physics that it is dubbed "the God particle" – is identical with the genotype of the phenotype universe, and each human genome is its reproduction. Based on this identification we posit that mass-giving is life-giving because the elementary particles that come into contact with the cosmic seed's biofield or quantum vacuum receive their mass and property as a result of that interaction. " http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/view/18585 Read the article and his site, then you'll be at least able tohave an educated look at the I.D side of the story before making retarded comments like "Do not pass go, do not collect 200$"
|
Firstly you misunderstand what I scientific theory in fact is, it is a hypothesis backed up by experiment. It is considered tested by science.
Secondly those passages you quoted are pseudo-scientific twaddle that make no sense whatsoever. Anybody with even the slightest hint of knowledge of the stuff they're talking about can see that. For one thing they know few to none of the properties of the Higgs Boson apart from the fact that it is an elementary particle - a human genome is an organism and made of billions of atoms. They are so completely different that to claim one is a reproduction of the other is just absolute twaddle. The other passage is just as bad.
To me it seems like they just threw in as many scientific terms into one paragraph and hoped that nobody would know what they were talking about other than the fact that it sound really really smart.
