Final-Fan said:
Kasz216 said:
akuma587 said: Not to mention that the poor are far less reliable voters than richer people. If everyone in the country voted, Democrats would have a built-in electoral advantage. |
Only for so long. The democrats don't have the best record with actually helping the poor.
Most likely they'd end up being replaced by a third party.
Not really there fault though... as it was said....
"I have come to the conclusion that one useless man is called a disgrace, that two are called a law firm, and that three or more become a Congress!"
A national holiday on election day would be nice. Though even then i'm not sure that'd raise voter turnout that much. |
Am I crazy, or in the wrong thread, or did this used to say something else?
To respond to what it says now, they did a whole crapload of stuff in the New Deal era, and that's what most people seem to think is the sort of direction things are going to go.
|
It used too but i did some research.
Found out the reason the poorer states vote republican is because richer people in poorer states are more likely to vote republican.
AS for the New Deal era stuff. Last i saw a lot of people don't like the things of the new deal era that are most memorable.
Like Social Security.