Do You Believe in God or a Higher Power?

[Nirvana_Nut85]

WessleWoggle said:

Nirvana_Nut85 said:

The unfortunate thing is that site's like Expelled exposed never let the other side answer or respond to any of the claims or debunking statements that it supports. They use their opinions and supposed "Facts" taken from the other side and don't ask the people from the movie to respond to it.

You have to admit though, life starting on the backs of crystals sounds a lot more out there than an intelligent higher beinging.

 

Actually they sound equally valid to un unbiased reader. Your subjective connotations are what makes you find one more believable than the other. They are both equally valid claims, the problem is, I.D. is something you can't test, repeat, and observe, and therefore, it's not science. At all. It's philosophy at best, bullwank at worst.

Nirvana_Nut85 said:

My point is that i believe the scientific community should be more open to allowing debates because some of these guys for I.D do have interesting arguments and they do use scientific facts to support there theories. You  have to take a look at what scientist from that side of the spectrum are saying instead of what the Evolutionists claim there points are.

I mean if there was an equal opportunity for funding as well there would be more room to grow and larger opportunities for testing different theories instead of just pointing out flaws in the evolution theory to explain why it can't be possible.

To each his own though.

 

The problem is I.D. supporters that are fucking stupid assholes though on average. They twist around scientific facts and use half quotes and misinformation to make their case sounds like it has any grounds at all, which it doesn't cause there's absolute bullwank when it comes to actual proof of creation or I.D.

All I.D. creationists bullshitters do... They show you flaws in the evolution theory, and say, oh, there's some problem with that one theory, so therefore there's an intelligent creator!!! WOOHOO!!! Big leap in logic.

The problem is the things they point out ARE ALREADY EXPLAINED IN SCIENCE, most the time. I've been WAY around the fucking block watching back and forth refutations of creationism on youtube, and read quite a bit off bullshit websites too. I don't fully believe in evolution, and the big bang, but atleast there's logic and years of scientific research behind them, where as I.D. is a unjustified claim, THAT IS UNPROVABLE.

 Nirvana_Nut85 said:

They'll say well I.D is a ridiculous theory and from their perspective it may very well be but I find it ridiculous that they wont even allow proper debates to be held and at least give the I.D guys a chance to give their side.

I.D. Is ridiculous to anyone who gives a damn enough to actually look up the facts behind their bullshit.

Why SHOULD they give I.D. side a chance? Do they have a peer reviewed scientific study that show proofs for I.D.? NO!

Can they show proof of I.D., that you can, test, observe, and repeat? NO!

LET ME ASK YOU, HOW THE FUCK, DO YOU TEST, OBSERVE, or REPEAT INTELLIGENT DESIGN OR CREATION?

Until someone answers that, it's not science. At all. Do not pass go, do not collect 200$.

 

Lets remember now that Evolution is not a scientific fact, it is a theory he did.

Your biggest problem is that you sound just like every other person who claims they can debunk I.D, from the evolutionist side. When your give answer a statement made by someone you you use swear and use BOLDED letters and expect people to listen as if you were giving an educated response instead of an adolescent rant(or a fanboy rant for that matter).

 Honestly if your taking you I.D information off of youtube then there is your first fail. You should check out http://www.frontlinescience.com/. Dr. Kazmer Ujavorsy, has come up with some really interesting theories and below I'll give you some exerts from an article from the American Chronicle as well as a link to that.

 "Dark energy, that drives the expansion of the universe, is one of the deepest and most exciting puzzles in modern science. We posit that dark energy is the field manifestation of the parent seed of the universe, just as the cosmic vacuum’s zero-point energy. They all originate from the cosmic seed’s biophoton emissions, which blackbody radiation provides a holographic biofield for the generation of the physical universe. Based on the fact that the biophotonic radiation emitted by DNA is coherent, we predict that the cosmic seed's biophotonic field or "dark energy" is equally coherent."

"The elusive Higgs boson – so vital to the Standard Model of particle physics that it is dubbed "the God particle" – is identical with the genotype of the phenotype universe, and each human genome is its reproduction. Based on this identification we posit that mass-giving is life-giving because the elementary particles that come into contact with the cosmic seed's biofield or quantum vacuum receive their mass and property as a result of that interaction. "

http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/view/18585

Read the article and his site, then you'll be at least able tohave an educated look at the I.D side of the story before making retarded comments like "Do not pass go, do not collect 200$"