| numonex said: Sony magazines should be ignored because they are shrills of the video game business just like pro Microsoft and pro Nintendo magazines are dubious reviewers due to their bias reviews. GamePro are another dubious source because they are Sony biased. Wait for Gametrailers, IGN and a host of more reliable reviewers before getting a fairer reflection of the game. |
and if those say the game is good?what is the next excuse ?
at first it was
OMG sony lied about the graphics,,,then graphics turned great
suddenly changed to gameplay will suck,,,like KZ1,,,,,then beta player started reporting the game is very very good.
then it changed to: Reviewers will give it bad score like KZ1 casue beta tester were biased and the game is not good,,,,,upto this point 12 reviews are out and they are all very positive reviews( http://n4g.com/PS3/games/g-24194/tt/metareviews.aspx )
now it has changed to: These reviewres are biased and paid by sony ,,let's wait for other reviews(so that maybe one gives it a seven or six so we can celebrate)
i m worndering if ign/gamespot gives a good score what is the next lame excuse?
maybe you guys should come in touch with reality that the game is actually good heaven forbid
