SnakeEyez on 24 January 2009
| numonex said: 5 out 5 = 100%? Cons of the game should of meant the game gets a score of 4.5 out of 5 at best. No auto-aim, ugly menus and frame rate issues when loading new areas. Wait it is only Gamepro. I would wait until we see some better reviewers of this game. How come there is a new thread for every Kill Zone 2 review? There must be over 100 threads relating to Kill Zone 2 on VGChartz alone. One official Kill Zone 2 thread should be stickied and all the reviews should be put in that one thread. |
Are you kidding me? Of course 5/5 = 100%. It's a fraction, and when the numerator equals the denominator, the result is 1 (or 100%). Also, I'm guessing you didn't pay attention to the thread where it was stated that the framerate stutters (which do NOT interrupt the gameplay at all) are corrected for the final build. Also, I didn't know that not having auto aim means its bad, its a decision, not a flaw. Hmm...I didn't know u played the menus, obviously menus are very important for the game to be good/fun. Let's say that those are flaws and it should get a 4.5 out 5, is that SUCH a bad score? Grow up and stop hating for no reason other than it being on the PS3 only.
