By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Badassbab on 22 January 2009
Edit Thread
Phrancheyez said:
Badassbab said:
Phrancheyez said:
Barozi said:
Phrancheyez said:
$20 dollars and you guys think that's reasonable for DLC? Wow..just wow.

If the GTA IV was any good to begin with, I might be on the fence on this..but as horrible as that game was, you guys actually think paying $20 for DLC, which 'looks better' (don't forget, the game 'looked good' before it was released) is reasonable?

Wow..just wow..go waste your money=P I've lost faith in the GTA series after GTA IV.

Of course $20 is reasonable for a 10-15 hours expansion.

No matter how much dissapointed you are with GTA IV, calling it a horrible game is just ridiculous.

 

Ok..so it was just plain bad.

This is, by far, the worst GTA title ever released, and I've played and beat them all.  That's my opinion..so seeing as that's what I think, you expect me to say it's a good game?  Give me a break..this game was horrible.

 

Maybe if you put 'IMO' after describing GTA IV as 'horrible' in the first place others might respect your opinion a bit more.

 

You're kidding...right?  If I say something sucked, you assume it's a fact?  That's freakin awesome..I'm going to go change history now!

You obviously hate GTA 4 with a passion and your original post reeked of a patronising holier than thou attitude. Who's paying for a DLC cause the game looks better? Maybe some idiots are but most will pay cause of the additional content.