jetrii said:
Groucho said:
| jetrii said:
Groucho said: I think you are missing the upcoming nanotech wall for tech advancement. All three console makers will want to release a console before those problems get solved, let alone before they are affordably solved. |
That does not make any sense at all. Could you restate that?
|
I think you're overestimating hardware advancement, based upon history, and not looking forward at the smaller processes necessary to reduce heat/increase clock (as you suggest) for cheap console hardware. As the process size gets smaller, electron loss gets much worse -- resulting in a lot more heat generated. Unless diamond wafers become the Next Big Thing, or someone cooks up a cheap technique to fabricate chips smaller than 22nm (or even 32nm), the specs you listed are going to be top-of-the-line for several years, at best, and just not feasible for consoles, from a financial standpoint.
|
Actually, no, they are not. IBM already has working 45nm Power7 chips with 16 cores. None of these components are revolutionary, they are simply evolutionary. I expect the Cell2 and Power7 CPU to be 45nm and the GPUs to be 55nm or so. They are not anywhere near the situation you described.
|
So... they are cheap enough to produce en-masse at 45nm are they? And they run at 4.2 GHz? Sounds great!