If Microsoft pay, we'll write another "Sony is Doomed" article

[noslodecoy]

Snake said:

scottie said:
@ snake - that would explain his closing remark

"I'm not implying that Microsoft is paying publications to diss their competitor, but it's obvious that they're benefiting in the internet battle."

Misleading title, perhaps the thread should be closed

 

 

i named the theard by the name of the article. how would you name the theard?

 

How about, "Journalist Doesn't Understand the Meaning of 'Imply'"

You could even work in the idea that maybe journalists like to write sensationalist articles with sensationalist headlines to rope in readers (i.e. "Sony is doomed" or "Microsoft Pays Off Journalists").  Just because some are guilty doesn't make it "noble" or give the journalist "integrity" by using the same tricks for a counter argument.  It just proves they're as bad as the rest and should be trusted just as little, if not less.

In other words, this article is complete rubbish.