3rd Parties: Why Would They Pick The PS3 Anymore?

[Garamond]

amirnetz said:

twingo said:

amirnetz said:

The bottom line: If you are a smaller developer with a limited budget then focusing on a single platform is not such an bad option. In fact, there are around 50 third party titles due to release this year that will skip the PS3 to save these costs. Are they all fools? No. Just doing their math.

 

lmao well what are these 50 3rd party tiels bud.

yahh got none do you.

Any samll dev will skip 360 all together and develop a Psn title, just doing their math.

You might want to do your research bud.

Look in the thread http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=50914

Here is a summary for your convinience. Look for the inclusion rules in the thread. the list dates back to October and covers the period to the end of 2009 .

 

Showing on the 360 but denied on the PS3:

 

SOME LIST

 

I completely understand your point, but the I read "50 third party titles due to release this year that will skip the PS3 to save these costs" as there being 50 new third party exclusives being realeased on the 360 this year. Just looking at that list, though, a lot of those exclusive third party games look like junk. Just about every good third party game is multi-platform, which makes the 360 the better option for most given it costs half the price of the PS3. [iamgettingstreetfighterivforps3though]

...

And whoever said BlazBlue is going to be a PS3 exclusive, nobody knows at this point. ArkSys also made Battle Fantasia, which was released on the 360/PS3 in Japan, but only ported over to the 360 in America. BlazBlue is basically the next in the Guilty Gear line of games, and that's their big fighter. I doubt they'd only release it on the PS3 given the precedent they've set with Battle Fantasia. Actually, I'm kind of paranoid it'll only get a 360 release and I'll have to buy some 360 stick if I want to play it. Which I wouldn't then, I guess.

GO GO POKEMON GOTTA CATCH 'EM ALL