| EL_PATRAS said: im sorry to say that you practically do not explain anything in this threads introduction, and the evidence you use to prove your points is truely weak. One of them is a piece of shattered metal presumably from an american airlines plane. It is the only scrap around the site that could belong to the 747 american airlines plane we're reffering to. No indestructible pieces of the wing, no large enigine parts, no bodies, no lugage, nothing that would resemble an airplane impact, except of course a twisted piece of titamnium, which doesnt even match the color of the plane was all that was found at the supossed wreckage site. Another piece of evidence supporting the conspiracy theories, is the fact that the mannouver which we're supposed to believe the pilot executed in order to crash into that side of the pentagon is phisically imposible due to ground effect(look it up if you don't know what it is) All your other explanations are equally feeble, and easily countered (I will not go into details as to not make my post excessivley long) but i must say that you fail to give any ground breaking evidence proving 9-11 to be an actual terrorist attacks or tell us anything we didn't already know. Your statments are based on your faith in good will and irrational assumptions instead of cold hard facts. Thats not the best way to create a theory is it? |
Jesus Chirst, what's wrong with you. Here. Happy? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:757_pentagon.gif *Plane bitch.*
Plane crash. Flight 77. Also, if the pilots were any good at flying airplanes, then the ground effect wouldn't have been a problem. Considering the amount of effort that went into this, then surely a pilot could overcome an increase in drag.
Meanwhile, conspiracy theories are based on their faith in corruption and irrational assumptions and ignoring cold hard facts. That's not the best way to create a theory, is it? If the government couldn't cover this up. They can't even cover up a break-in to a hotel, or selling of weapons to Iran. Face it, you're the one using irrational assumptions.









