Perhaps there's been a miscommunication. My original goal was to demonstrate that banning homosexuality and banning murder are equally imposing morality. Thus, the assertion that one shouldn't impose morality would contradict the assertion of the immorality of murder. Therefore, if one wanted to go ahead and be inconsistent, it must be realized he's just as guilty of breaking the "no imposing" morality as is the anti-gay. This was my intent, to either get the imposing-morality argument dropped, or to accept one is just as guilty of imposing.
I have no contention with the group that claims both murder and all other religions are wrong (at the moment), for I was attacking an inconsistency, which is not present in this latter situation.
Finally (and off-topic), I might try this argument against all other religions: If I can prove Christianity is right, then all other religions are wrong, according to Christianity (which I just proved right (in this hypothetical situation)).
But that's a different matter.
Okami
To lavish praise upon this title, the assumption of a common plateau between player and game must be made. I won't open my unworthy mouth.
