| markers said: "Maxim: 3.5/5 (70%) (not counted into average due to unanimous request of the thread posters) "Impressive lighting effects, motion blur, and graphics make this first person shooter the hottest girl at the ball, if not quite the best dancer."" i still do not understand that review. is that all they said about it? |
Hot, but not the best dancer.
What's not to understand? Sounds like they were mind-blown by the graphics but couldn't get past the controls, which is and will always be the most common complaint about KZ2. It doesn't control like a hyperspeed floating camera, so some people will never like it just for that reason.
This flap about the Maxim score is silly. What? Do you guys just want to ignore every non-90+ score that KZ2 gets? Some people are just not going to like the game! Big eff'ing deal. I don't know what county, or delusional fantasy world, some of you guys are living in, but in the real world, people actually read Maxim magazine. If I told my friends that Maxim gave a game 3.5 stars out of 5, but MEGamer gave it a 99, they'd go by the Maxim score, because that's a publication that more than seven people in the US have actually heard of before.
It's just one review, and it isn't even a bad one. Get over it.
