cura on 20 January 2009
Is there any point in this thread?
the trolls are simply going to use this as proof of killzone 2 being a massive flop and the ps3 fanboys (myself included) are going to argue that you can't conclude anything from this review because (a) maxim is not a reputable source (b) we don't have access to the review and thus can't gauge the reasons why it scored as it did 
you can never tell what a game is like from one review in isolation and (d) there are almost always disparity between review scores because at the end of the day they are subjective (however, despite there being inconsistencies in review scores a 'consensus' will emerge, e.g. metacritic).
Honestly, some of you just can't help yourself, constantly flamebaiting others.
