Now what am I even going on about? This is completely irrelevant to the point that I was originally making, and that we fundementally agree on.
His moral zeitgeist is based on social freedom and protection, thusly allowing murder and pedophelia is never going to happen. This we agree on, it is acknowledged.
The moral zeitgeist is determined collectively by man. This we agree on. Could it lead to pro-goat sex legislation? Theoretically yes. Is that relevant? No.
Is his Zeitgeist wrong because of apparent contradiction? No more so than any other moral or social zeitgeist that has ever existed which are all full of contradiction, because it can't be escaped. If you want to debate on that fine, maybe tomorrow.
Can social freedom exist while maintaining moral objectivity? Pluralism says so. Is that a contradiction? Does it matter?
POWER TO THE GAYS!
You can find me on facebook as Markus Van Rijn, if you friend me just mention you're from VGchartz and who you are here.
