CAL4M1TY on 18 January 2009
Those pictures don't make the 2005 CGI look all that impressive, and I guess it isn't 4 years on.
On top of that motion blur, whilst pretty, doesn't make a game technically brilliant. I would have been more impressed if there were more images like the one in JOKA's sig, where they don't need motion blur to make the game look good (although the game doesn't look as uberific in that sig as all the PS3 fanboys are trying to make it out to be either)
But the topic is CGI Vs Review build, and yes, based on those pictures, review build looks better. Woohoo, we've managed to catch up to almost half decade old cgi technology! (Sorry for the sarcasm, but if I don't anti-hype Killzone 2, the PS3 fanboys will ruin the game for us all..)
