By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
ZenfoldorVGI said:

It's shocking how propaganda can shape your perceptions. I imagine most people believe the PS3 is much more graphically capable than the 360, and it very well might be. However, that opinion is based mostly off of Sony's PR and word of mouth via Sony faithful, than actual comparison.

Ironically, the most graphically capable game out so far this gen on a console has been Gears of War 2, an Xbox 360 exclusive. Of course that will all change with Killzone 2, but again, most people believe that the PS3 is the massively powerful graphics machine simply because Sony says so, and they validate that acceptance by pointing to the price. Why is it so expensive if it doesn't blow the competition out of the water graphically?

How ignorant we all are.

God, aren't people terrible? They'd be much better off never believing anything they're told; it's such a deceptive world and they're only going to get hurt!

Forgive me if I find your assertion that a machine can only justify its high price by providing the best polygons a waste of words. We're all aware that the PS3's price reflects upon its inclusion of Blu-ray, and not upon some (as yet unlived, in your opinion) capability of providing better graphics.