jcp234 said:
Right, because clearly the 360 will not release amazing titles and the progression of the 360 life cycle is static? And why would Microsoft release a $500 console? I think every console manufacturer here on out has learned from the blunders of Sony. One company was under the impression that it could push a $600 console even if it had zero games (Sony). I can point out a host of other illogical assumptions in your post, but I think I've made my point. You should apply for a job at Sony. |
Microsoft had their best shot at wowing folks with their games in '08 when they had what everyone thought should have been several AAA titles including Tales of Vesperia, Lost Odyssey, Fable 2, Ninja Gaiden II, Too Human, and Gears of War 2. Yet how did the majority of those games turn out? When all was said and done only one turned out to be a bonafide AAA title. Their best years were '07 and '08, but those years are behind them while we haven't even started to see the best from Sony. And even though we haven't even started to see Sony's best yet, they still had the best games released last year and won the most awards for their games of all the consoles. MGS 4 best shooter action adventure game, Valkyrie Chronicles best JRPG and SJRPG, and Little Big Planet Best Innovative Game.
Heavens to Murgatoids.







