| akuma587 said: Some of you don't understand. Its not just about this one incident. Its about the precedent this sets if the Supreme Court allows it. You allow one exception like this to pass by, and next thing you know things worse than this are springing up across the country. |
Very true. To take an obvious example, do you think roe vs wade was just about whether or not Mrs. McCorvey was alowed to ahve a legal, private abortion? Of course not; Roe v. Wade set a precedent that abortion is fine and dandy if you fee you need one.
This case might do the same thing. And imo, rampant strip searches arn't fine and dandy.







