nightsurge on 17 January 2009
| Screamer77 said: I have a question then: If the Xbox is easier to develop for and the PS3 is such a pain to develop for, and they are for arguments sake "equal" in terms of power, then how come a game such as killzone 2 looks better than ANY game on the Xbox? Are the developers for the 360 not as advanced as the killzone makers? THe killzone developers have stated somewhere (it`s in the forums somewhere) that it uses something like 60% of the cell power. WHy isn`t there a game that looks this good on the Xbox. BTW I am not trying to add any fuel to any fire here but it`s an interesting question. |
Lets see, Killzone 2 development time = how many years? 4+? Gears 2 development time = 2 years. If the 360 devs wanted to waste years on just one project, the 360 could easily have a game looking better than Killzone2. Gears 2 is already only barely less than Killzone 2, and the devs of Gears say they can get even more out of the 360 for the sequel aka Gears 3.
