Cueil said:
It's amazing that there are people who are this blind. Even Halo 3 didn't have the budgit of Killzone 2 and MGS4 doesn't look to much better than Gears 1 did. Uncharted 1 isn't some awesome game that can't be done it's simply the work of a superb developer who low coded a engine to work on the insanely difficult to program for system. A Lot of the BS you Sony fanboys spew is retarded... that you think those devs can't produce those same levels on the 360 is an insult to them. Barring your ever present statement of BR vs DVD size the systems are pretty even... they have strengths and weaknesses that hold on from being obviously better than the other. |
Well to be fair they would of added FF13 1 year ago.
I really havent seen anything on the PS3 that looks leaps and bounds over the 360 in fact on many games I see teh opposite. There are a few stand outs on the PS3 but Uncharted is definitely not one of them...though it is a fun game and very easy to overlook. MGS4 looks very good for a console game but the game uses many tricks to enable that level of detail and it is still very monotone. I have seen games that used middleware on the 360 that looked almost as good.
Case in point I have a blast with Wipeout on the PS3 the graphics technically aren't a marvel....but the game is fun and I think the graphics are perfect for the game.
I still failed to be impressed by KZ2 and I feel that while the game looks good many Sony fanboys look at the game with a skewed perspective. Either that or I am spoiled by my PC and missing the boat completely. The fact that the poster mentioned Infamous only reinforces this opinion. Heavy Rain is a different story but as the game is not released yet and to my knowledge no gameplay demonstrated out of video it is difficult to gauge at this point but it certainly is not the best graphics I have ever seen.







