Jo21 said:
that doesn't make sense and here is why. maths never lie if we look into floating point calculitons you only need 4 SPU to match xenon theorical maximum (that actually never reach either). that left other 2 SPU and PPU. at most cell it's 30-40% more powerful. as for power ps3 it's the ultimate gaming machine in console market, anyone with brain and enough info on CPU will tell you that the thing is putting in sync 6 SPU and a PPE is not an easy task. a calculator doesn't have the CPU power to play tetris (unless you are talking about a Texas Instrument calculator). so that also depends on the calculator. >_> i wanna see a 360 title doing the particles, animations, textures, effects etc, that killzone 2, uncharted 1-2, and gran turismo 5 are doing. EDIT: in the article he even doens't state they are equal but rather , they have strenght 360 is easier to work with but you can get more things running in parallel on the ps3. what he practically said is "here is a glass half full, and the other have a glass have empty." |
Check the bottom of the article. It is pretty clearly stated where he says "they are about equal"
And the SPU's and FLOPS and all that mean nothing.. that's all theoretical potential. From actual use, with the give and takes like others have mentioned, the two systems end up being about equally as powerful.







