The reality of the PS3 frame-rate "issues" versus Xbox 360

[Game_boy]

GranTurismo said:
In your post game boy you said that the PS3 has a low amount of Ram, when infact it has the same amount of Ram as the 360, the PS3 shares its Ram between the CPU/GPU. Plus most people know that the FPS are going to increase next year in the madden sports games, considering last years games on the 360 all ran at 30 FPS.

Sony and many other companies have already been able to bring the PS3 past the 360 in Graphics, Sony has made serveral sports games at 1080p and 60FPS, plus the guys behind GT have made their game run at the same specs.

Games like Killzone, RFOM and unreal have proven that the PS3 is can do just as much if not more then the 360.

Yes indeed, games have proven that the PS3 is not being used to its full potential. I do not dispute this; however I think Sony's choice of architecture makes it very difficult for everyone other than Sony to make great games. The PS3 should, for the money, have better than the 360 every time, not sometimes. And it is a low amount of RAM in the context of the price tag. You're basically saying the PS3 is used equally to the 360, and I think currently that's a best-case scenario, and I was trying to explain why. You can't bash me on fanboyism either because I don't like Microsoft and never buy their products if I can but have to admit they have a better console setup especially with the price factored in.