@Nightsurge I believe Selnors topic was debunked pretty early in on that one :x Everyone has "facts" about what each processor can and can't do. We know for a "Fact" that the 360 has 3 3.2 ghz cores, and the the PS3 has 1 3.2 ghz core, and 7 SPE's each running at 3.2 ghz. Lets just go with the obvious statement that we know which will outperform which in terms of CPU power. If you take a look at both of the "theoretical peaks" or the fact that everyone uses PS3's for insanely stupid calculations and not the 360, or that the PS3 has more 1080p games, or that it's exclusive titles boast some incredible prowess.... etc etc etc etc. it's fairly obvious without being to blinded :/
I was merely stating that the PS3's cell is know for oustanding computing power (whether or not it's usable), and that the Cell was also built to work with the RSX (whatever that means). IF this method is achieved using the PS3 architecture, then it would be obvious why the 360 couldn't do it >_>
From 0 to KICKASS in .stupid seconds.
