Fumanchu on 12 January 2009
| dib8rman said: ^ Ha, right and the person saying any other team is (under the logic you used) by defacto going to claim their team will win, neither party are better than the other in such a pathetic structure of logic, my point is reenforced. Heres a better analogy than the one you used; you see a fire you toss a bucket of liquid on it to put it out, but that bucket was gasoline and guess what your holding - guess where the fire is going. If the logic line makes sense in that analogy, then relate it to what was done in this thread. Regardless of what you or others like you may think; your stance's, arguements and your statements speak much louder than your rationalizations. |
How exactly is it reinforced?? At least the whole public is open to share their opinion...
I don't think I'm alone here in assuming that the way the thread title question is proposed under a given criteria that it's inclination is to have more favourable replies in line with his theory. Ultimately it didn't work out because he painted a door red in a bull farm.
Agree to disagree then - I don't feel strongly enough about it to warrant any further discussion.
