By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Griffin on 12 January 2009
Edit Thread
Fishie said:
Griffin said:
xcot said:
Griffin said:
The_vagabond7 said:
xcot said:
well honestly it doesn't compare. Crysis has better physics than any game has dreamt of, it has open world gameplay, making the scale of the graphics amazing. It has huge draw distances, better textures, better AA and all at higher resolutions. Heck it even has better lighting on every object.

 

I think that's what alot of people forget. The sheer scope of Crysis. Even if KZ2 managed to get close in fidelity of it's character models, lighting, and textures (which it's not) it's going to be on a much much smaller scale than crysis's gigantic open world. KZ2 looks great on PS3, but it's tech just isn't in the same league. Even if comparing guns makes it seem so.

KZ2 also uses ray-tracing not even your powerful Crysis can do that.

And that article fails on so many levels its insane.

 

are you trying to imply kz2 is in any way superior to crysis?

 

Yes i am.  Killzone uses features that Crysis does not.  Real time ray-tracing is something Killzone2 does and Crysis does not.

 

The game does not use real time ray tracing.

They have some in cutscenes yes but even there they are cheating and its not real time.

 

In the latest interview which was just posted the other day on a dutch site, he says during this one part where he is showing something they are using real time ray-Tracing.