By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
largedarryl on 12 January 2009
Edit Thread
Dryden said:
llMikeB said:
Crysis on a good enough PC looks great, Killzone 2 looks great. I like Killzone 2's lighting, art direction and character animations better. Most important of course is which one is more fun to play.

Well ... obviously there was a reason they didn't side-by-side compare that.

Maybe I'm missing something here, but what exactly was the point of doing a side-by-side of a game on a $400 console vs a game on a $2000 PC? Computer games have been graphically superior to home consoles since the 1970s. Do people still debate this?

You do not need a 2k PC to run Crysis on those settings.  A GTX260 is capable of running Crysis in 1900x1200 with Ultra high (0xAA) and running at a stable framerate.  This means you hardly need 2k computer to run the game, more like $800 for the required.  If you are including the monitor, you should then be including the $1500(minimum) for the HDTV to get the PS3 to produce those graphics.