The only point of comparing KZ2 to a game like Crysis, at all, would be to demostrate that the PS3, being hardware from 2006, still compares reasonably to PC hardware of the modern day, as a gaming platform -- primarily due to Sony's, apparently true, claims that the PS3 was much more capable than PCs of the day (and the X360), and that it could (not would) lead console gaming into the next generation with an exceptional level of quality.
I don't understand how this could be misinterpreted as "Killzone 2 needs to be be better than modern PC shooters in order to accomplish its goal of being the best looking shooter available on any console of the current day and age"
The implications of the relative comparable nature of KZ2 to Crysis, despite Crysis' HUGE tech advantage are obvious. The PS3 is shaping up to be the great platform Sony advertised it to be, from a technological standpoint in 2006.
I would wager that that's the point of quite a number of Sony 1st party titles this year, as a matter of fact. To up the bar past what the X360 can provide. Not past what the PC can provide, at any time, or at any cost. (lol?)
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
