bobobologna on 11 January 2009
| irstupid said: sounds like a reasonable score. Sure the graphics, environment, story or what else you might want to say are great for this game. But as this review said no co-op, and nothing really new or anything brought to the genre just makes this game prettier than others, but missing co-op and who knows what else some games have brought. I mean heck weren't reviewers praising Halo 3 for having that level editor (very minimal in my opinion) and sending videos and stuff to each other. How many console games have had that since? I just don't see how you can give this game a perfect 10. Just missing co-op right there should be a dock for the game in points. It seems most all FPS these days come with a co-op of some sort, and now even having like 5 players co-op. (wasn't there some game recently said to have that?) |
Yea, Bioshock completely sucked because it didn't have co-op, or hell, any multi-player component at all. And it didn't bring much new to the genre (ever played System Shock 1/2 or Deus Ex?) so all those high review scores were totally off base.
