| papflesje said:
You then hop back onto the "why would anyone invade the planet" when plenty of answers have already been given, namely "they invaded first, then a retaliation to finish the job is now in order in KZ2", but once that answer is given, you jump back onto the storyline and the graphics. |
Someone says something, and I respond. Then someone elses comes back with the SAME point someone else said, and I respond to the same way. That is rince and repeat. I also try to more diplomatically bring things to closure, but the same points keep being brought up, like my criticism of the game is the color scheme, and I explain that isn't it. But then SOMEONE ELSE again brings it up, and now brown and grey are like an inside joke in this thread.
If you want an end to the rince and repeat to this thread, here it is:
I will say, if the environments are diverse in Killzone 2, then my questioning the variety of play is moot. If the storyline is fleshed out properly as to the cause for the invasion, then you have an answer to why. With both of these done, my question is moot.
Does this make sense? This is a summation of what I have been trying to say, and can we leave it at that? Or is someone else going to jump in and whine that I am complaining about the color scheme. This is seriously getting old if that happens. In the mean time, I was trying to make light of the thread, but apparently that didn't go anywhere. So, on this note, I said what I said, based upon what was said in here, and will look to have it close. Apparently Killzone 2 is such a scared title for Sony fans, that even to question any part of it will bring the wrath of fandom upon anyone that does.
Maybe mods can lock all threads questioning Killzone 2, as to not to upset Sony fans on here.
