How Guerrilla Games has changed over the years...

[chaospluto]

makingmusic476 said:

vlad321 said:

This is the short list of things I can list that were wrong with KZ, awkward control scheme, frame rate issues, short draw distance, distracting graphical issues. Also the gameplay itself, most importantly, was mediocre. Oh, also an inconsistent AI. Yes bugs were part of the bad, but not the whole thing at all.

 

MM, if we're gonna be playing excuses, RPM racing by Blizz was coded entirely by 1 person. And BioWare's 2nd game was Baldur's Gate. What game are GG on right now?

 

I don't see why you're trying to "excuse" those that I listed.  My entire point is that few devs hit it big on their first game.  Often not anywhere close to their first game (as you ignored every other game Bilzzard worked on, as well as my example of Epic Games).

Guerrilla is on their fourth game.  Their first two games were developed simultaneously, and their third game was pretty darn good, receiving scores almost two points higher than it's predecessor from websites like IGN (9.0), Gametrailers (8.5), and GameSpot (8.3).  I wonder how much higher Killzone: Liberation's average would be on Game Rankings if G4 hadn't given it a 40.

and Liberation had a High Userbase rating.