Killzone 2 surpasses Crysis

[Fishie]

bobobologna said:

headshot91 said:

Fishie said:

haxxiy said:

Physics is better (what else you could expect, Cell vs Pentium 4) but graphics wise hell no. I mean, even on 720p Crysis need what, 500 megatexels per frame...

Still looks as good as a console game can be.

 

 Watch this then talk again:

 

A few things.Why is everybody getting so emotional? Does it matter really that much that crysis is being compared to kz2. I am just going to base my opinions on gameplay. Furthermore @ fishie, while the physics in crysis are great you do realise that is being rendered frame by frame as it runs at less than 2 fps in real time? Just wanted you to know...

 

 

Not even 2 FPS in real time.  0.2 FPS in some parts according to the video.  Meaning that it takes 5 seconds to render a single frame.  Very bad example of how Crysis phsyics are "better" than Killzone 2's.  I'm sure Killzone 2 could just add a ton of physics objects (even if they have to use the HDD to cache things from which would slow things down even further) and get shitty framerates and show it off to demonstrate the "power" of their engine.

Anyways, IMO, Killzone 2 looks like the best console game to date, but not as good as Crysis.  Beats out Gears of War 2/Far Cry 2/MGS4/Uncharted handily IMO.  The particle system and lighting look especially nice.

 

 

LOL