DMeisterJ on 10 January 2009
| starcraft said: I will just quickly point out that that website has an established history of Sony-leaning articles. To the point you have to wonder if they have any idea what's actually going on in the world of gaming. Once again I'll simply state that Killzone 2 looks like a marginal graphical improvement on Gears of War 2, which itself looks nothing like as good as Crysis. At the end of the day Sony has spent anywhere between $60-100 million on a game on ostensibly the most powerful console (even if the difference over the Xbox 360 is marginal) over the course of four years with work spanning at least three studios and they STILL fall FAR short of Crysis. Console's haven't peaked (none of them), but it's fair to say Crysis is safe. |
I'll answer these in order you posted them.
Lol. Looking through the site, they seem the same as any other site, they're gushing over the Wii and Obama story, so lol.
Lol. KZ2 is marginally better than Gears 2? That's a lie. But I will admit, neither game is near Crysis running on the highest settings for the 1% of the gaming population that can run it.
Lol. Pure speculation, you don't have any clue how much the game costs/ed. You don't know how many years it was in development, and you don't know how many studios worked on it. Don't flat out lie.
Agreed.
