twesterm said:
DMeisterJ said:
twesterm said:
DMeisterJ said:
Kasz216 said:
DMeisterJ said: IGN still says playing, and GS said playing.
There's no reason to lie about that.
I just don't understand when Gamestop > IGN in terms of belief.
Do you remember Kane + Lynch? Jeff Gerstmann? Did you guys already forget? For shame. |
That's actually my point.
Why would all these websites quote Gamespot over IGN?
So... either they didn't and had their own people there... or had a reason to believe gamespot over IGN.
|
I don't follow... @_@
All I know is IGN corroborates my point, and Gamespot did for a little while today. I'm not sure of what else to say. IGN still has it up, obviously I'm not lying that it was said.
|
Forgive me if I missed something because I stopped paying attention to the thread early in page 2 and now it's on page 6 but wouldn't them changing it to sold (assuming that is what happened) mean something?
|
And wouldn't IGN still having it on 'playing' mean something?
|
Maybe they just aren't as quick to edit? It just seems more significant to me that a place did edit their original article.
|
Or, it's more significant that that a place didn't edit the article, since no information otherwise came out.