| The_vagabond7 said: So it's a win for the wii that a last gen system actually has games that look as good as 360 or PS3 but the wii can't? As for the bolded part, I posted most accurate screenshots you can get of Super Mario Galaxy and was accused of picking poor quality screenshots to try and make the game look bad, and then the claim was made that super mario galaxy doesn't really look like that. "SMG looks nothing like that, either you have seen it and are trying create a false impression or you have never seen the game. Because if you had seen the game you would know it looks much better than those pics." If that is the response to showing 480p directfeed screenshots of the most graphically advanced game from a fanboy of that game, that's not a good thing. |
Um no you didn't. Just look at Sqrl's post and then tell me that the screens you posted were the most accurate. They aren't even close. You could even find better screens from IGN itself if you looked harder. I'm not saying you purposely did this, but you didn't pick the most accurate screens.
@OP YES the Wii is more powerful than the original XBOX. Like others said the reason why Wii games don't show this too often is because developers don't push it to its limits. Tons of the Xbox games in this thread DID push the Xbox to its limits. Out of all of the games mentioned in this thread I'm pretty sure most of them were a constant 30 fps. Almost all of the Wii games mentioned with the exception of a few run at 60fps with better results graphically.(Super Mario Galaxy, Metroid Prime 3)
