nightsurge said:
Snake, I'm not sure if you realized this or not... you're new so I'll explain: This website you are on right now reading this thread, tracks sales. The numbers are from this very website. Go to Chartz>Hardware Table, and set your parameters. Also, he was not "comparing" console sales to basketball. He was giving what is known as an analogy. He was using the basketball example to say that: winning 3 quarters in basketball and losing VERY BADLY in the 4th quarter leads to losing a basketball game just the same as winning 3 quarters of the year and losing VERY BADLY at the end of the year leads to losing the total yearly sales The analogy fits perfectly. And why would you give a "false example" in an argument??? Even if you didn't have 2 seconds to open up another page from this very website, you could have at least tried to give a "true example." Should not the console that is newer and on it's 3rd year sell more? That is usually the trend, so it seems the PS3 even failed to outsell the 360 in what is the PS3s "peak" year. |
My internet is kinda slow lately so i didn't want to was 30 secnods (not 2) to open a new window. If you are winning 113:61 in last three quarters and you lose 61:15 in last quartet it would be 128:114. i wasn't talking about video game consoles i was talking about basketball. And PS3 is on market for 2 years. 2007-2009. 360 is on market for 4 years. 2005-2009. So people excpect 360 sales are 2 TIMES BIGGER THAN PS3 SALES. BUT THEY ARE NOT. PS3 sales are about 70% of 360 sales.And i don't care about worldwide. What is important to me that all my friends have PS3 and so do I. i am not gonna play games with some guy from Japan. i am gonna play it with my friends. PS3 is selling better in my city than 360 and that's wha tis important to me.








