By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
McStormy1 said:
ksv said:

So Nintendo games don't have artistic integrity because they sell well? Never mind they are the developer with the highest number of critically acclaimed games in the industry. I guess the Zelda series, Super Metroid, Super Mario Bros series, Mario Galaxy, Metroid Prime etc are just crappy mass market products with the lowest amount of effort for the biggest amount of sales.

ICO on the other hand, now that is made by true artists.

 

 

What insights can you find or idea's can you interpret from playing Mario, Zelda and Metroid? Nothing. They are simply games with fun and polished gameplay mechanics. They won't challange your perceptions nor will they provide anything more meaningful than an afternoon of fun. There is nothing wrong with that, however IMO Sonys console and even MS' offer a deeper more well rounded experience with games that are simply mainstream fun and a niche of games that are more progressive in their idea's for gamers looking for a deeper experience. Nintendo's games are creative, I would not say they constitute art or even strive to however.

Okay, you're insane. Every game ever made by a corporation is concerned with making money for its developers and publishers, directly or indirectly. No game is about "challenging your perceptions". How does shooting people until you yourself die (which are >90% of the games on an HD console really) consitute "progressive ideas"? How can a game be a "deep experience" when it isn't real and beyond the level walls there is empty space?