| richardhutnik said: A problem with threads like this is, even if one game clearly looks inferior, a fanboy for the system it is on will say the exclusive game on their system looks best. My take is the track environment looked better in Forza 2 (road was more detailed for one), but Prologue had more detailed cars in how they looked. We are at a place where game physics and the feel of driving is what matters most. The graphics are close enough to each other to be secondary. And, on that note, I dislike GRID because of it. I didn't like the demo AT ALL. I did like DiRT enough though. I am not going to disrespect GRID, but just say I didn't like it. |
Forza 2 is inferior graphics wise in both track and car departments. Im more a 360 fanboy then a ps3 fanboy and I will admit that Forza, being microsofts big racing sim is a little embarasing on the graphics front. The physics are very nice, the speed could feel a little faster (the game is slow in comparison to GT5 and how the real world feels) but there is no way any one could validly say forza looks better in any way to GT5p. That game falls to pieces when its upscaled to 1080p and looks like rubbish, there is pixel stepping all over the lines of the cars and it totaly wrecks it for me. GT5p however displays very very VERY nicely in 1080p even if its horizontal line has a few less pixels. And where is the cool cockpit view!!! come on microsoft!!!! forza is missing the visual bells and whistles that GT5p has
If at first you don't succeed, you fail
