By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
vdoesntforgive said:
Squilliam said:
@Vdoesntforgive:

A weaker PS3 makes a stronger Wii, theres no such thing as a strong 2nd when the Wii is involved. It makes the PS2 look like a chump competitor in comparison. Think about how strong the Wii would have been if all 7th generation games were ported to it? The only reason why the HD consoles are surviving really is a lack of Wii production and massive losses that both Sony and Microsoft have been willing to take.

 

Weaker in what sense? I can't think of a justifiable reason for calling the PS3 "weaker" by removing blu-ray, other then having to do more work on compression and what not.

 

Strong second, weak in the face of the Wii. I won't argue the semantics. The point is, they would've sold more, and they would've lost less. Whether they were still 10 million behind the wii wouln't have mattered, because the position would've been a lot more tolerable for all those involved.

Because you have to acknowledge every mistake they made not just Blu Ray. They made their console hot, power hungry and hard to develop for. The "Blu Ray mistake" is only a portion of the losses they faced when they made the console. Everything that the PS3 is now made it expensive, so to fix every mistake they made would be to make it into something entirely different. The closer the PS3 is positioned to the Wii, the more it will eat it alive. The closer the PS3 is positioned to the Xbox 360 the more Microsoft will be willing to burn through the the dollars to keep Sony down. There is no safe middle ground in this generation for anyone and especially Sony.

Edit: @ Grampy:

I am the demon Reality made manifest through this vessel.

 

 



Tease.