The veto vote is ironic because Russia and China have used it in cases where their vested interests relate to Zimbabwee and Mugabe along with Sudan too.
Ironic because the West complains about that suspension of justice but when Israel was going to firstly be publicly shamed over accusations they were infringing on human rights for Palestinians including mass non-combatant casualty deaths and then, just last week, the demand to halt military action in favour of a ceasefire, both were vetoed by the US.
Look at the history of veto's by the 5 permanent members and there is clear bias, vested interests and shameful ignorance of moral standards.
It should be changed because today its not just about 5 countries, after all its the G12. If they required 2 countries to veto a decision the war might have been stopped last week. Britain and the EU don't want it to continue.
“When we make some new announcement and if there is no positive initial reaction from the market, I try to think of it as a good sign because that can be interpreted as people reacting to something groundbreaking. ...if the employees were always minding themselves to do whatever the market is requiring at any moment, and if they were always focusing on something we can sell right now for the short term, it would be very limiting. We are trying to think outside the box.” - Satoru Iwata - This is why corporate multinationals will never truly understand, or risk doing, what Nintendo does.
